In debate, which element is NOT part of the structure of a case?

In a debate, the structure of a case typically includes components that are essential for constructing a logical and persuasive argument. Subsidiary claims are crucial, as they support the main claim and help in organizing the argument. Evidence support is equally essential because it provides the factual backing needed to substantiate the claims being made, making the argument credible. Attack or defense strategies are significant as they prepare the debater to counter the opposing arguments or reinforce their own stance.

Emotional appeals, while they can be a powerful tool in persuasion, do not constitute a structural element of a case. Instead, they serve a supplementary role, aiming to sway the audience's feelings rather than logically support the argument’s framework. This is why emotional appeals are not considered part of the fundamental structure required to build a strong case in debate.