What are "hazy arguments" characterized by?

What are "hazy arguments" characterized by?

• A. Clarity and strong supporting evidence
• B. Lack of clarity and concrete reasoning
• C. Logical reasoning and well-supported claims
• D. A clear and structured approach

Answer: (B)

Hazy arguments are characterized by a lack of clarity and concrete reasoning. This means that they often present ideas or assertions that are vague or poorly defined, making it difficult for the audience to understand the point being made. In addition, these arguments typically lack solid evidence to support their claims, which can weaken their overall persuasiveness. When an argument is hazy, it may use ambiguous language or fail to connect logically, leaving gaps in reasoning that can confuse readers or listeners. This contrasts sharply with well-structured arguments, which are clear and supported by relevant, strong evidence. Therefore, the defining characteristics of hazy arguments center around their inefficiency in communicating ideas clearly and logically.

Hazy arguments are characterized by a lack of clarity and concrete reasoning. This means that they often present ideas or assertions that are vague or poorly defined, making it difficult for the audience to understand the point being made. In addition, these arguments typically lack solid evidence to support their claims, which can weaken their overall persuasiveness.

When an argument is hazy, it may use ambiguous language or fail to connect logically, leaving gaps in reasoning that can confuse readers or listeners. This contrasts sharply with well-structured arguments, which are clear and supported by relevant, strong evidence. Therefore, the defining characteristics of hazy arguments center around their inefficiency in communicating ideas clearly and logically.