What defines a coordinative argument?

A coordinative argument is characterized by its collaborative nature, where multiple arguments come together to reinforce a central claim or thesis. This type of argumentation is essential in debates and persuasive writing because it builds a stronger case by presenting various facets of the overall argument. Each individual argument contributes to the strength of the main claim, creating a cohesive and persuasive narrative that is more impactful than any single argument could achieve on its own.

In contrast, the other options describe different types of argument relationships. Independent arguments do not support each other or the main claim actively, making them less effective in a coordinated context. Arguments that clash would typically create a debate or conflict rather than support a single claim. Finally, implied arguments rely on subtleties and may not explicitly connect to the main argument, which is not the case for coordinative arguments that aim for clarity and direct support.