What does the "on case" strategy refer to?

What does the "on case" strategy refer to?

• A. Attacks relating to the broader debate context
• B. Attacks on the affirmative's original case
• C. Supporting the status quo arguments
• D. Introducing new unrelated arguments

Answer: (B)

The "on case" strategy specifically refers to focusing attacks or arguments directly aimed at the affirmative's original case in a debate. This involves critically analyzing the premises, evidence, and logic presented by the affirmative side and seeking to dismantle their arguments from within the framework they have established. By addressing the affirmative's case directly, debaters can challenge the validity of their claims, point out flaws in their logic, or present counter-evidence that undermines their case. This approach is crucial for the negative side as it allows them to engage with the specifics of what the affirmative has asserted, rather than drifting into tangential discussions or broader issues that may not effectively counter the affirmative arguments. Addressing the affirmative's case "on case" ensures that the debate stays focused and allows for a more structured examination of the arguments presented.

The "on case" strategy specifically refers to focusing attacks or arguments directly aimed at the affirmative's original case in a debate. This involves critically analyzing the premises, evidence, and logic presented by the affirmative side and seeking to dismantle their arguments from within the framework they have established. By addressing the affirmative's case directly, debaters can challenge the validity of their claims, point out flaws in their logic, or present counter-evidence that undermines their case.

This approach is crucial for the negative side as it allows them to engage with the specifics of what the affirmative has asserted, rather than drifting into tangential discussions or broader issues that may not effectively counter the affirmative arguments. Addressing the affirmative's case "on case" ensures that the debate stays focused and allows for a more structured examination of the arguments presented.