Which of the following best describes an "Outweigh" defense?

The "Outweigh" defense primarily focuses on showing how the significance of the opponent's argument is minimal in comparison to the claims being presented by the debater. By emphasizing the insignificance of the opponent's points, a debater can effectively redirect attention towards their own more impactful arguments. This method is particularly useful in debates where both sides present arguments; highlighting how the opposing argument does not hold as much weight helps to strengthen one's own stance.

In contrast, increasing evidence against the opponent's claim is a different approach that focuses on directly countering their arguments rather than diminishing their importance. Presenting a totally new argument shifts the focus entirely and doesn't address the existing claims presented in the debate. Challenging the format of the debate pertains more to the procedural aspects rather than focusing on the content of the argument itself. Therefore, the best description of an "Outweigh" defense aligns with emphasizing the insignificance of the opponent's argument.