Which step comes first in the attack process?

Which step comes first in the attack process?

• A. Develop the attack
• B. Select an attack type
• C. Flow the opposing case
• D. Perform the attacks

Answer: (C)

In the context of the attack process in a public debate setting, flowing the opposing case comes first. This step involves meticulously tracking and noting the arguments presented by the opposing team. Flowing is essential because it allows debaters to have a clear understanding of the structure and key points of the opposing case, which is necessary for formulating effective arguments and counterarguments. By flowing the opposing case, debaters can identify weaknesses, points of contention, and areas where they can effectively challenge the opposition. It sets the foundation for subsequent steps, such as selecting an appropriate attack type and developing specific attacks tailored to dismantling the opposing arguments. Overall, flowing the opposing case is crucial for preparing a strategic response in a debate, making it the initial step in the attack process.

In the context of the attack process in a public debate setting, flowing the opposing case comes first. This step involves meticulously tracking and noting the arguments presented by the opposing team. Flowing is essential because it allows debaters to have a clear understanding of the structure and key points of the opposing case, which is necessary for formulating effective arguments and counterarguments.

By flowing the opposing case, debaters can identify weaknesses, points of contention, and areas where they can effectively challenge the opposition. It sets the foundation for subsequent steps, such as selecting an appropriate attack type and developing specific attacks tailored to dismantling the opposing arguments. Overall, flowing the opposing case is crucial for preparing a strategic response in a debate, making it the initial step in the attack process.